volunteer_data:top
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
volunteer_data:top [2022/04/24 00:34] – tim | volunteer_data:top [2024/03/17 22:56] (current) – yang | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Volunteer Data Analysis ====== | ====== Volunteer Data Analysis ====== | ||
+ | ====Volunteer Matching==== | ||
- | **Meeting: Jan 17, 2022** | + | |
- | * Presented results of experiments on Volunteer data and Movielens | + | |
- | * Discussed the metrics for measuring performance on the two datasets | + | |
- | * Showed graphs of two methods and their performance on the two datasets | + | |
- | * Key: the BOA method still outperforms LDA in both datasets. | + | ====Persistent community detection==== |
+ | * [[volunteer_data: | ||
- | * **Comments | + | ====Recommendation |
- | * To compute metrics as a whole and not aggregate them separately for each user. | + | |
- | * To apply BOA method on a recommendation paper and compare the results | + | |
- | * To compile a representative code and send to the professor | + | |
- | * To read literature on latest work in RS. | + | |
- | **Meeting: Jan 24, 2022** | + | |
- | * Discussed the possible alternatives of embedding the data, social net embedding | + | |
- | * Refined the life document to include user history pertaining to time, location and participation history | + | |
- | * Discussed a few papers that have used GNN for prediction | + | |
- | * **Comments and Future work** | ||
- | * To read the papers related to Social Recommendation eg, Song et al (2019) | ||
- | * Understand the nature of embeddings they used for the input data | ||
- | * Summarise findings of papers (using GNN) whose data is similar to ours | ||
- | |||
- | **Meeting: Feb 18, 2022** | ||
- | * Presented a Survey on GNN Social recommendation | ||
- | * Presented Item-to-Item KNN method used by Amazon | ||
- | * Discussed two papers on Social Recommendation and presented their findings | ||
- | * Paper 1: GNN for Social Recommendation - Fan, Ma, Li, He, | ||
- | * Paper 2: Session-based Social Recommendation via Dynamic Graph Attention Networks, Song, Wang and Xiao (2019) – (ACM, WSDM) | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | ||
- | * To begin working on experiments related to dynamic session-based recommendation | ||
- | * To make a list of the features and embeddings that can be used from our data, | ||
- | * Determine session and neighbours based on our data, eg location based or participation based. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | **Meeting: March 1, 2022** | ||
- | * **Attendees: | ||
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (19: | ||
- | * **Discussion** | ||
- | * Tim presented a proposal on GNN | ||
- | |||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | ||
- | * To clarify the research problem by formulating the underlying mathematical nitty gritties | ||
- | * To consider geographic location and tasks types as input features and determine how to incorporate them | ||
- | |||
- | **Meeting: March 23, 2022** | ||
- | * **Attendees: | ||
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (11: | ||
- | * **Discussion** | ||
- | * Shutong presented and discussed the plan on how the experiments will be conducted. | ||
- | * Tim presented the findings on the first experiment for Session based GNN | ||
- | |||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | ||
- | * Tim to write a brief methodology discussing his implementation of the algorithm | ||
- | * Need for providing details for experimental plan and hyper-parameter tuning | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | **Meeting: March 31, 2022** | ||
- | * **Attendees: | ||
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (11: | ||
- | * **Discussion** | ||
- | * Tim presented a write up of methodology section that also included experiment plan | ||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | ||
- | * Tim to give more clarity on the network architecture diagram | ||
- | * To consider node embeddings as one hot key vectors | ||
- | * To also include task type information on the volunteer preference | ||
- | * Tim to remind Shutong and the professor every week before each meeting. | ||
- | * Shutong suggested Tim to use PPT to draw flowchart and diagrams | ||
- | * Shutong suggested to provide reference code for matching task types | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | **Meeting: April 7, 2022** | ||
- | * **Attendees: | ||
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (11: | ||
- | * **Discussion** | ||
- | * Shutong presented her preliminary experimental results | ||
- | * Tim discussed the DGRec framework. | ||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | ||
- | *Shutong to continue with her experimental plan | ||
- | *Shutong to consider narrowing the research towards a more specific problem | ||
- | * Tim to conduct experiment and reproduce the results in the paper | ||
- | * **Attachments: | ||
- | * {{: | ||
- | * {{: | ||
- | |||
- | **Meeting: April 14, 2022** | ||
- | * **Attendees: | ||
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (11: | ||
- | * **Discussion** | ||
- | * Shutong presented statistical data for Pioneers to be used in an article | ||
- | * Tim presented the reproduced results from the paper | ||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | ||
- | *Shutong to write a summary of her latest findings | ||
- | * Tim to consider a naive baseline approach that will be compared against the current method | ||
- | * **Attachments: | ||
- | * {{ : | ||
- | |||
- | **Meeting: April 21, 2022** | ||
- | * **Attendees: | ||
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (11: | ||
- | * **Discussion** | ||
- | * Shutong presented a summary of her proposal and latest findings | ||
- | * Tim compared the performance of voting process/ | ||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | ||
- | * Tim to explore at least one or two graph models for further comparison | ||
- | * Shutong to make recommended adjustments to the presentation | ||
- | * **Attachments: | ||
- | * {{ : |
volunteer_data/top.1650774887.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/04/24 00:34 by tim