volunteer_data:top
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
volunteer_data:top [2022/04/15 02:09] – tim | volunteer_data:top [2024/03/17 22:56] (current) – yang | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Volunteer Data Analysis ====== | ====== Volunteer Data Analysis ====== | ||
+ | ====Volunteer Matching==== | ||
- | **Meeting: Jan 17, 2022** | + | |
- | * Presented results of experiments on Volunteer data and Movielens | + | |
- | * Discussed the metrics for measuring performance on the two datasets | + | |
- | * Showed graphs of two methods and their performance on the two datasets | + | |
- | * Key: the BOA method still outperforms LDA in both datasets. | + | ====Persistent community detection==== |
+ | * [[volunteer_data: | ||
- | * **Comments | + | ====Recommendation |
- | * To compute metrics as a whole and not aggregate them separately for each user. | + | |
- | * To apply BOA method on a recommendation paper and compare the results | + | |
- | * To compile a representative code and send to the professor | + | |
- | * To read literature on latest work in RS. | + | |
- | **Meeting: Jan 24, 2022** | + | |
- | * Discussed the possible alternatives of embedding the data, social net embedding | + | |
- | * Refined the life document to include user history pertaining to time, location and participation history | + | |
- | * Discussed a few papers that have used GNN for prediction | + | |
- | + | ||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | + | |
- | * To read the papers related to Social Recommendation eg, Song et al (2019) | + | |
- | * Understand the nature of embeddings they used for the input data | + | |
- | * Summarise findings of papers (using GNN) whose data is similar to ours | + | |
- | + | ||
- | **Meeting: Feb 18, 2022** | + | |
- | * Presented a Survey on GNN Social recommendation | + | |
- | * Presented Item-to-Item KNN method used by Amazon | + | |
- | * Discussed two papers on Social Recommendation and presented their findings | + | |
- | * Paper 1: GNN for Social Recommendation - Fan, Ma, Li, He, | + | |
- | * Paper 2: Session-based Social Recommendation via Dynamic Graph Attention Networks, Song, Wang and Xiao (2019) – (ACM, WSDM) | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | + | |
- | * To begin working on experiments related to dynamic session-based recommendation | + | |
- | * To make a list of the features and embeddings that can be used from our data, | + | |
- | * Determine session and neighbours based on our data, eg location based or participation based. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | **Meeting: March 1, 2022** | + | |
- | * **Attendees: | + | |
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (19: | + | |
- | * **Discussion** | + | |
- | * Tim presented a proposal on GNN | + | |
- | + | ||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | + | |
- | * To clarify the research problem by formulating the underlying mathematical nitty gritties | + | |
- | * To consider geographic location and tasks types as input features and determine how to incorporate them | + | |
- | + | ||
- | **Meeting: March 23, 2022** | + | |
- | * **Attendees: | + | |
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (11: | + | |
- | * **Discussion** | + | |
- | * Shutong presented and discussed the plan on how the experiments will be conducted. | + | |
- | * Tim presented the findings on the first experiment for Session based GNN | + | |
- | + | ||
- | * **Comments and Future work** | + | |
- | * Tim to write a brief methodology discussing his implementation of the algorithm | + | |
- | * Need for providing details for experimental plan and hyper-parameter tuning | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | **Meeting: March 31, 2022** | + | |
- | * **Attendees: | + | |
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (11: | + | |
- | * **Discussion** | + | |
- | * Tim presented a write up of methodology section that also included experiment plan | + | |
- | * **Comments and Future work** | + | |
- | * Tim to give more clarity on the network architecture diagram | + | |
- | * To consider node embeddings as one hot key vectors | + | |
- | * To also include task type information on the volunteer preference | + | |
- | * Tim to remind Shutong and the professor every week before each meeting. | + | |
- | * Shutong suggested Tim to use PPT to draw flowchart and diagrams | + | |
- | * Shutong suggested to provide reference code for matching task types | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | **Meeting: April 7, 2022** | + | |
- | * **Attendees: | + | |
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (11: | + | |
- | * **Discussion** | + | |
- | * Shutong presented her preliminary experimental results | + | |
- | * Tim discussed the DGRec framework. | + | |
- | * **Comments and Future work** | + | |
- | *Shutong to continue with her experimental plan | + | |
- | *Shutong to consider narrowing the research towards a more specific problem | + | |
- | * Tim to conduct experiment and reproduce the results in the paper | + | |
- | * **Attachments: | + | |
- | * {{:volunteer_data: | + | |
- | * {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | **Meeting: April 14, 2022** | + | |
- | * **Attendees: | + | |
- | * Professor Yang Li, Shutong and Tim (11: | + | |
- | * **Discussion** | + | |
- | * Shutong presented statistical data for Pioneers to be used in an article | + | |
- | * Tim presented the reproduced results from the paper | + | |
- | * **Comments and Future work** | + | |
- | *Shutong to write a summary of her latest findings | + | |
- | * Tim to consider a naive baseline approach that will be compared against the current method | + | |
- | * **Attachments: | + | |
- | * {{ : | + | |
volunteer_data/top.1650002975.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/04/15 02:09 by tim