mobility_data:top
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
mobility_data:top [2022/03/10 08:54] – [Meeting Note] zhiyuanpeng | mobility_data:top [2022/10/24 09:24] (current) – [Meeting Note] zhiyuanpeng | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== 2021 Project Page ====== | + | ====== 2021-2022 Project Page ====== |
===== Mobility Data Project ===== | ===== Mobility Data Project ===== | ||
==== Meeting Note ==== | ==== Meeting Note ==== | ||
+ | 2022/10/24 | ||
+ | * Attendee: Zhiyuan, Xiangyu, Yuanbo, Yang | ||
+ | * Meeting Summary | ||
+ | Xiangyu | ||
+ | * Xiangyu shared a instance normalization method for time-series forecasting against distribution shift which published in ICLR 2022. | ||
+ | * Using this method the MSE of MLP for gaode' | ||
+ | * Next step I will implement this method in our meta-learning framewrok to see the improvements and compare the effiectiveness of our method and the normalization.[Presentation-slides: | ||
+ | * Zhiyuan | ||
+ | * Summary: | ||
+ | * this week, I conducted a series of experiments to compare our Soft-restricted MF Multi-task learning model performance with single loss trained ones. | ||
+ | * This weeks experiments reveal that the multitask loss only contributes limitedly to the improvement on the both two tasks. | ||
+ | * Moreover, the LSTM based backbone tends to predict more smoother compared to the more fluctuated data in reality. | ||
+ | * An important observation: | ||
+ | * Future Plan: | ||
+ | * Maybe next week we can try to use multi-source input data or time sequence analysis method to deal with it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 2022/6/30 | ||
+ | * Attendee: Zhiyuan, Xiangyu, Yang | ||
+ | * Meeting Summary: | ||
+ | * Transcribe the matrixed-version formulation into its Lagrange version | ||
+ | * Use gradient descend and integer projection to iteratively update the optimization problem | ||
+ | * Interpretation and analysis the loss result of the proposed method | ||
+ | * Regard the greedy algorithm as the supremum while the dynamic programming and real-relaxed optimization as the infimum and compute their approximation rate to measure the outcome with the optimal result | ||
+ | * Integer rounding the result in real-domain by the hyper parameter threshold. | ||
+ | * Make sure the application of the Pathlet is use a top-k dictionary to recomposite new trajectory and find how much information can be kept | ||
+ | * TO-DO: | ||
+ | * Find the optimal threshold to integer round the real-domain solution, meaning we use matrix formulation to update result while guaranteeing the integer constraints | ||
+ | * Find the application for the Pathlet in real-world project such as new coding for the spatial data | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 2022/06/08 | ||
+ | * Attendee: Zhiyuan, Yuanbo, Yang | ||
+ | * Meeting Summary: | ||
+ | * Zhiyuan Peng: | ||
+ | * Briefly introduce the general implementation of the dynamic programming with specific data structure. | ||
+ | * Exemplify one trajectory results under different λ. | ||
+ | * Yuanbo Tang | ||
+ | * Introduce the proposed algorithm in state machine term and analogues to the backpack problem in greedy thoughts (but need to connected to a specific math problem in order for its correctness) | ||
+ | * Analyze and compare the result of proposed method with DP (including dictionary size and representation cost under different λ) | ||
+ | * Use toy model to interpret the logic fallacy and disability to the optimal results | ||
+ | * Based on finite map and sufficient trajectories, | ||
+ | * TO-DO: | ||
+ | * Survey on the linear restricted minmax convex optimization and whether the max option can be replaced? | ||
+ | * Think the optimization in matrix version, proposed optimization algorithm version. Could it be connected with Markov decision process | ||
+ | * If our model brings in more features, we can use NN. | ||
+ | * Connect the proposed algorithm with some math problem like multi-armed bandit | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2022/05/11 | ||
+ | * Attendee: Zhiyuan, Xiangyu, Yang | ||
+ | * Meeting Summary: | ||
+ | * Use package ‘pyechart’ in python to visualize the cumulative record amount in different h3 hexagon with data from XIAN | ||
+ | * Implement LSTM on the processed data to predict the future record in each 5min time piece till 5 times | ||
+ | * Prepare the PPT for opening report | ||
+ | |||
+ | * To-Do | ||
+ | * Find the historical data construction used in literature,survey on how to jointly use long/short term data. We can use fusion or residue methods | ||
+ | * Find the metrics to measure the prediction other than MSE, such as MAPE | ||
+ | * For solution of the data sparsity and erratic, we can make a hybrid model. | ||
+ | * First, we set a threshold to filter out those districts of historical average less than the threshold, and adopt a traditional statistical model | ||
+ | * Second, we can use our multi-task DNN to predict other places. | ||
+ | * At last, we can hybrid these two situations together | ||
+ | * Find out the challenge and remedial algorithms | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
2022/03/09 | 2022/03/09 | ||
* Attendee: Zhiyuan, Xiangyu, Yang | * Attendee: Zhiyuan, Xiangyu, Yang |
mobility_data/top.1646920448.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/03/10 08:54 by zhiyuanpeng