intern:construction_har
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
intern:construction_har [2022/08/12 01:33] – kenzjk | intern:construction_har [2022/08/13 10:28] (current) – kenzjk | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Research on Xsens and the different modules of sensors it offered was done. | * Research on Xsens and the different modules of sensors it offered was done. | ||
__Aug/ | __Aug/ | ||
- | * Looked into the modules MTw Awinda and Xsens DOT. | + | * Looked into the modules MTw Awinda |
* Created a document detailing the differences between the two to aid my professor in deciding which one to purchase. | * Created a document detailing the differences between the two to aid my professor in deciding which one to purchase. | ||
__Aug/ | __Aug/ | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
__Aug/ | __Aug/ | ||
* Studied // Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks // and discussed this paper with my professor. | * Studied // Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks // and discussed this paper with my professor. | ||
- | * Did research on some common libraries implemented by machine learning programs, such as SciKit-Learn, | + | * Did research |
__Aug/ | __Aug/ | ||
* Coded an iris flower-distinguishing program using Sklearn. | * Coded an iris flower-distinguishing program using Sklearn. | ||
* Began to code and train a standing-or-walking-distinguishing program as a first step to our final program to be implemented at construction sites. | * Began to code and train a standing-or-walking-distinguishing program as a first step to our final program to be implemented at construction sites. | ||
__Aug/ | __Aug/ | ||
- | * Continued training | + | * Successfully read in all the data from the UCI HAR Dataset |
+ | * Studied an open source HAR algorithm on GitHub (https:// | ||
__Aug/ | __Aug/ | ||
+ | * Successfully trained my program using the UCI HAR Dataset, but prediction accuracy was not ideal. | ||
+ | * Experimented with common HAR classifiers seen on GitHub to try to find better prediction accuracy. | ||
==== 5. Final Report PPT ==== | ==== 5. Final Report PPT ==== |
intern/construction_har.1660282384.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/08/12 01:33 by kenzjk